Showing posts with label torrey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label torrey. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Just an update on my life...
...I'm sick :(  Fever, back ache, and head ache last night, still have a cough today but must get better by Friday because...

...I'm going to Lancaster to do a Spanish production of Speechless and outreach ministry work over the weekend!!!  Leaving this Friday and staying the weekend as long as I'm not sick...

...which will partly be dependent on how stressed I am between now and then, which was part of what brought on being sick...

...because I have two reflection essays due tomorrow, getting ready for Lancaster, college applications, etc...crazy busy :)

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Midsummer Night pull question

Elizabeth H. Bush
Mr. Bartel
TA Yorba Linda
Shakespeare
Pull Question-Midsummer Night's Dream
September 24, 2009


Is love in our world as arbitrary as the love of the enchanted lovers in A Midsummer Night's Dream?

In the world of the lovers of  A Midsummer Night's Dream, love itself seems to be a dream, mixed up, topsy turvy, and never constant.  First, Demetrius and Lysander are in love with Hermia, while Helena is left to love Demetrius without return.  Then by the aid of Puck's magic potion, both Demetrius and Lysander turn their eyes upon Helena, abandoning their previous paramore, Hermia.  In the end, the original lovers, Lysander and Hermia, are reunited, while Dmetrius turns back to his first love Helena through the aid of another of Puck's magic potions.  It seems to me however, that the constancy and fidelity of love in Shakespeare can be called into question by the example of these lovers, who fall in and out of love at the mere drop of a hat.
"But that is merely the effect of faeries' magic," you may argue, "and my lover and I will remain true to one another forever."  Yes, granted, Hermia, Helena, Lysander, and Demetrius' love was confused and shuffled through the potion, but in the end, does not Demetrius wed Helena still under the effect of that same potion?  Romantic love such as is portrayed by Shakespeare is just as magical, mysterious, arbitrary, and incomprehensible in our day as it was in his.  Falling in love is something no scientist can explain, no psychologist can rationalize.  Like faerie's magic, eros is something that comes upon us unawares, bewitching our minds and altering our senses.  While it lasts, we are caught in its grasp, unable to explain why we do what we do except by attributing it to love.  Yet it may leave as suddenly as it comes, leaving us bewildered, yet seemingly sober and rational.  Our lovers, like deserted Hermia and Helena, may follow us with tragic laments, accusing us of infidelity and instability, but this is eros.  Like the faeries who caused it, eros is a sprite, a feather in the wind, fickle and inconstant, blowing whither it will.  
Is there then no hope for lovers in the world?  For those who choose to submit to the passion of eros, must htey also accept its arbitraryness?  Do we fall in love wilfully knowing that we may as quickly fall out of love?  Those who have loved pray that it is not so, but unfortunately it often is.  With no faerie potions to alter our vision and direct our emotions, causing us to love another until the faeries choose to remove that love, we of the modern world must manage our own love affairs as best we can with little but our own hearts to guide us, and as seen in Shakespeare, these hearts can be as fickle as the faeries themselves.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Torrey Academy, how I love thee!

Last night, I had the great honour of attending once again the Torrey Banquet.  Being surrounded by family and friends, being with those I had discussed and argued with all year long, meeting face to face those who before were only a colour and a font, a name without a background behind it, all these and more were blessings of the banquet.  
Congratulations to all who placed in the term paper contest!!!  Gabriel, your paper was amazing :)  Jonathan, I have to read yours.  Fellow FAT/FoOF winners, and to the Inklings winners, congratulations and I am honoured to stand in your company.  
Ahh, Torrey Academy, thou has been good to me.  From the first time I walked into Inklings, not knowing a soul and confident that I knew it all, to the final day of Foundations, rejoicing with classmates who had become friends, and learning with new humility, Torrey has been a journey of humility, of faith, of camraderie, of growth, of pursuit of goodness truth and beauty.  But most importantly, it has been a journey to find God.  Often I've lost sight of the ultimate goal, getting lost in the page long sentences of Locke, confusing theology of Williams, and late night reflection essays on Lewis and Lincoln.  But you my dear classmates and friends and tutors, never cease to bring me back and open my eyes anew to the wonder of God's holiness, wisdom, and love.  
This morning, I attended my younger sister's homeschool open house.  One of her classmates gave a dramatic recitation of the passage in Acts where Peter and John heal the lame man.  I had heard this story frequently, as all good Sunday School children have.  Today, however, I heard the story with a new understanding.  Too often we go through life begging for alms, asking for things, and in the case of Torrey, asking our tutors for the answers to hard questions, extensions or excused assignments.  We don't look up to glory and to God, but down at the papers to be written, books to be read, things to be done, and always ask ask ask.  But as Peter and John did, our tutors come along, and instead of giving us what we think we want, they command us, "Rise up and walk.  Take charge of your own education.  Own your beliefs.  Learn, think, grow."  They refuse to hand us the answers, but give us the strength to find the answers for ourselves.  And in doing so, our tutors point us up, ever higher, to God.  
Thank you, Miss Romero, Mr. Bartel, for your unfailing love for me.  Thank you for refusing to let me take the easy way out, but giving me the strength to look up to God.  Thank you, fellow classmates of Yorba Linda, for discussing with me and encouraging me and making this year such a memorable one.  Thank you, dear Torrey friends, for walking this journey with me.  
Thank you God, for Torrey Academy, which points me to you.  Soli Deo Gloria!

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Term Paper...

...is finally finished!  Rejoice with me, all ye fellow Torreyans, for a great cloud has been lifted from over us, and we are free once more to breathe in air unspoiled stress and fear.  The dragon named Term Paper has been slain, and I present him here to you as a gift from your humble fellow comrade in arms in this great battle known as Torrey Academy. 

Poetry: Songs of Self or Pictures of Paradise?


Poetry, the tuneless melody of the Muses, has been penned for many purposes.  To sing of sorrow and unrequited love, to praise the natural beauties of leaf and lake, to immortalize the dazzling beauty of one’s beloved, all these and more have been reasons for writing poetry.  However, without a true understanding of what poetry is and what purpose it serves, one’s poetry will be shallow and meaningless, centered in self.  To create meaningful poetry, the poet must have a purpose deeper than serving self.  Although Walt Whitman views poetry as mere self-expression or an outlet for self-centered emotion, Emily Dickinson and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow write the most excellent poetry which depicts their visions of an ideal world because their poetry illustrates virtue, proclaims truth, and reveals beauty.

To poets such as Walt Whitman, poetry is a method to express one’s emotions, likes, or dislikes.  Emerson holds this view of poetry, saying, “The poet also resigns himself to his mood, and that thought which agitated him is expressed” (Emerson 273).  In writing poetry, the author’s primary motivating force is himself; from his thoughts he draws his subject matter.  When he has an idea, nothing will suit him but to first surrender himself to this idea or feeling, and then express it to the world through his poetry.  Concurring with Emersonian philosophy, Whitman’s poetry serves as an outlet for one’s feelings.

In his masterpiece Song of Myself Whitman expresses his feelings and knowledge of himself.  “Dow-hearted doubters dull and excluded,/Frivolous, sullen, moping, angry affected, dishearten’d, atheistical,/I know every one of you, I know the sea of torment, doubt, despair, and unbelief,” laments Whitman (Whitman 43.27-30).  Through heavy, pounding rhythms and varied vocabulary, Whitman pours out his feelings of doubt and despair, expressing the mood which he is experiencing, as Emerson says the poet ought to do.  Furthermore, Whitman waxes eloquent on themes of himself, proclaiming himself as his key motif.  “If I worship one thing more than another it shall be the spread of my/ own body, or any part of it,/ Translucent mould of me it shall be you!” (Whitman 24.36-38).  The rest of the poem continues in a similar vein, an ode to man, and to one man in particular.  Self-expression is the essence of Whitman’s poetry.  Therefore, if Emerson is correct in his estimation of poetry as expression of one’s feelings, then Whitman’s 52 stanza song to himself is the pinnacle of poetry.

On the contrary, DeToqueville asserts that true poetry is a vision of something outside the poet.  Poetry is more than expression of self, or lines and stanzas on a page; it is “the search for and depiction of the ideal” (DeTocqueville 458).  When writing poetry, the poet should not seek to describe the world merely as he sees it, but how he believes it should be.  The best poetry is that which creates a new world for the reader, capturing images of perfection and weaving them together to create something new.  For DeTocqueville, the purpose of poetry is not “to represent the true, but to adorn it, and to offer a superior image to the mind” (DeTocqueville 458).  Rather than bare statements of fact, poetry should present the most beautiful images to the reader.  However, presenting truth is a major component of poetry, though not the essential purpose.  Though poetry is not intended solely to present statements of fact, the best poetry will be that which is true, as well as good and beautiful.  To become poetry that reflects the world truly, three characteristics—goodness, truth, and beauty—are needed.   

The first purpose of poetry is the illustration of virtue.  Not only must a good poem display a certain standard of right and wrong, it must uphold good while condemning evil.  Longfellow’s “The Song of Hiawatha” sets a specific standard of right for Hiawatha.  When Hiawatha is commanded by the youth to “Make a bed for me to lie in,/Where the rain may fall upon me,/ Where the sun may come and warm me” he obeys, and is rewarded for his obedience by the gift of corn for him and his people (Longfellow, “Hiawatha’s Fasting” 2.23-25).  As Longfellow draws attention to Hiawatha’s virtues, he calls the audience not only to see and appreciate good but to act upon it, as poetry ought.  Longfellow’s poem sets certain actions, particularly obedience, as definite virtues to be emulated.

However, Whitman’s poetry blatantly rejects goodness, proclaiming the author to be “not the poet of goodness only, I do not decline to be the poet of wickedness also./ What blurt is this about virtue and about vice?” (Whitman 22.18-19).  In Whitman’s eyes, the key element of poetry is self, and both goodness and evil are merely aids to discovering and being oneself.  Whitman neither condemns evil nor upholds good; indeed he does not even praise evil nor revile good, but remains indifferent to both.  “Evil propels me and reform of evil propels me, I stand indifferent,” utters the writer, showing his utter disregard for goodness, the first criteria for true poetry (Whitman 22.21). 

In addition, poetry ought to proclaim some essential truth to its readers.  Its purpose is not only to depict a scene or story, but to present truth.  Through the story of Hiawatha’s fight with the young god Mondamin and subsequent receiving of the gods’ gift of maize, Longfellow illustrates, “How by struggle and by labor/ [One] may receive what [he] has prayed for” (Longfellow 1.33-34).  Longfellow’s poem makes a specific point; only by hard work will one reap rewards.  By working and waiting, Hiawatha’s prayers are answered, and the gods’ gift of corn is bestowed upon the people.  Poetry ought to avoid mere venting of emotions while speaking absolute, relevant truth unto its audience, as Longfellow’s does.  In doing so, Song of Hiawatha fulfills the second criteria of poetry in illuminating truth to its readers.

Unlike Longfellow, Whitman also ignores this essential mark of good poetry, choosing instead to proclaim his subjective feelings rather than objective truth.  Preferring to dwell only on himself, Whitman declares, “Your facts are useful, and yet they are not my dwelling,/ I but enter by them to an area of my dwelling” (Whitman 23.17-19).  Using truth as a method to its own ends when convenient, but discarding them when they are not, Whitman’s poetry presents to the readers no vital truth which they may incorporate into their lives.  However, as the title clearly indicates, Song of Myself is filled with praises of “Walt Whitman, a kosmos, of Manhattan the son,/ Turbulent, fleshy, sensual, eating, drinking and breeding” (Whitman 24.1-2).  His primary theme here and throughout the poem is not focused on speaking truth to his audience or conveying anything worth knowing.  Instead he merely uses poetry as a platform to proclaim self.  Here as in the issue of goodness, Whitman fails to live up to the standard of good poetry.   

Revealing beauty is the final purpose of poetry.  In his descriptions, Longfellow paints a vivid scene of “a youth approaching,/ Dressed in garments green and yellow,/ Coming through the purple twilight” (Longfellow 1.9-11).  With colorful adjectives is shown the beauty of a young man coming to Hiawatha at the end of the day, clothed in the colors of the woods and framed with a royal coronet of golden hair.  Also, beauty is displayed within the poem through a melodic rhythm and further descriptions.  By repeating key phrases, keeping a steady flowing meter, and describing the scenery, Longfellow incorporates the beauty of his setting with the beauty of his words, fulfilling the third requirement for poetry.

In beauty too, Whitman fails to meet this even more crucial standard for the best sort of poetry.  In description of his own body Whitman proclaims, “The scent of these arm-pits finer than prayer,/ This head more than churches, bibles, and all the creeds” (Whitman 24.35-36).  While Longfellow’s vision of beauty weaves images of the gods with a rhythmic melody, the most beautiful image Whitman can present to the reader is his own sweaty body.  Praising his own aroma as a finer scent than prayer, Whitman’s attempts at depicting beauty fall into mere exaltation of self.  His form too, lacks Longfellow’s flowing style as he fails to incorporate any sort of structure into his poetry.  Without a consistent rhyme scheme, meter, or indeed any other form of consistency from one line to the next, Whitman’s poetry is instead the formless ramblings of a self-absorbed man.   

Contrary to Whitman, Emily Dickinson’s use of goodness, truth, and beauty masterfully achieves the standard for good poetry, as she weaves images of nature and beauty with strongly punctuated, vibrant words.  Her poem number 729 embodies all the criteria for poetry—goodness, truth, and beauty—in one brief but brilliant poetic image.  First, Dickinson illustrates a primary virtue, loyalty, through this poem.  “Alter!  When the Hills do—,” she pleads to an unknown man, urging him to change only when unchanging nature does (Dickinson line 1).  When the hills change, when the sun questions himself, when the heavens and the earth pass away, only then will she change or waver in her love.  With images of nature in all its glory, Dickinson pleads for the virtue of constancy, promising faithfulness and requesting it in return.   

Dickinson’s poem also proclaims truth in her image of ideal love.  She promises her lover that she will have had her fill of his love “...When the Daffodil/ Doth of the Dew—” (Dickinson lines 5-6).  Throughout the poem, Dickinson uses images in nature, such as the radiant daffodil, unchanging hills, and ever-shining sun, to illustrate the truth that true love never changes, and never fades.  When the daffodil becomes tired of the nourishing dew, only then does she want her lover to tire of her love.  She too determines to follow the example of nature and never tire of her lover’s affection.  The truth of constant love is painted through Dickinson’s images of nature in her poetry.  

Finally, Emily Dickinson’s poetry contains the third crucial element of good poetry, namely beauty.  With her images of nature in all its glory, Dickinson conveys her message in a way that is clear and direct as well as beautiful in both form and content.  “Falter!  When the Sun/ Question if His Glory/ Be the Perfect One—,” she commands (Dickinson lines 2-4).  The image Dickinson paints of the sun, ever-shining in all its glory, resplendently confident in itself, resembles a confident lover, never questioning the beloved.  In addition, the beauty of her poetry manifests itself in form, with rhyming quatrains, alliteration, and a bold meter punctuated by exclamations commanding the lover to follow certain actions.  Through images of nature as well as structured rhyme and meter, Dickinson’s poetry clearly possesses beauty, the third mark of good poetry.

Because Dickinson and Longfellow’s poetry demonstrates virtue, declares truth, and displays beauty, they fulfill poetry’s purpose of depicting the ideal whereas Whitman’s poetry fails in all three categories while viewing poetry as self-expression or an outlet for self-centered emotion.  The best poetry is not merely an ode to self, but an image of perfection.  To depict this ideal, three essentials are needed in poetry—goodness, truth, and beauty.  By upholding good and condemning evil, poetry meets the first criteria of illustrating virtue.  In addition, the best poetry will express some key truth or intent.  Finally, poetry must reveal not only external beauty through form, but reveal the inherent beauty of goodness and truth.  The greatest poetry is that which is not merely an artistic expression of the poet’s emotions, but an articulation of some vital purpose or image.  To write truly good and beautiful poetry, the poet must not sing odes to oneself, but use his words to paint a picture of an ideal world.  Through poetry, the poet takes his readers out of themselves, and on a journey to paradise.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Death by Term Paper

..somewhat like death by scratch-and-sniff, only for Torrey students ;)  
So next Tuesday, I have my final Foundations term paper due...I actually do like this paper, it's a comparison of Whitman's poetry to Longfellow's and Dickinson's, arguing that Whitman's poetry fails because it is too self centered.  Fun paper!  But it's due next Tuesday...and this Friday I tutor all morning, and have Speechless dress rehearsal that afternoon/evening.  Then Sunday is my sister's birthday...and Tuesday is my term paper.
After that...next Friday is Speechless!!!  Then Saturday a potential Speechless discussion, followed by my sister's birthday party/ a movie party with some friends from the Shakespeare class...death by term paper, yes?
P. S. brownie points to those of you who got the pushing daisies reference ;)

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Term Paper

Hello all faithful readers...
As promised a month or more ago, here is the term paper to go along with the two descriptions I posted on here in December.   

Physical Beauty: Dangerous Passion or Divine Pursuit?


Today, physical beauty is an all-consuming passion.  For some, the drive to appear beautiful becomes an obsession leading to sin.  Observing this alarming trend, the Church has downplayed physical beauty, labeling it a worldly pursuit.  In movies, books, and fashion, Christians have come to equate beautiful with worldly.  Although contemporary Christian culture rejects beauty as a superficial distraction from spiritual matters, the Church should regard beauty as an essential element of Christian virtue because beauty reflects the glory of the Creator, inspires men to worship the Lord, and guides them in a right understanding of the nature of God.  

Modern churches are designed to be practical as opposed to beautiful.  Many congregations have moved away from the ornate tradition of more orthodox churches, constructing their sanctuaries without regard to style or appearance.  John Wesley’s philosophy of a Christian’s use of money agrees with that of modern churches.  He exhorts Christians not to “waste any part of so precious a talent, merely in gratifying the desire of the eye by superfluous or expensive apparel, or by needless ornaments” (Wesley, “The Use of Money” 245).  By purchasing only what is necessary rather than ornamental, one saves money for what is important and has the ability to further God’s work through financial gifts.  Contemporary churches, built with the intent of providing a meeting place for the congregation without concern for embellishments and empty adornment, appear to fully meet Wesley’s standards of the proper use of money.

Not only is physical beauty an impractical use of resources, it is also considered a distraction from spiritual matters.  Within church buildings as well as Christian media, beauty is looked down upon as a worldly pursuit that will deter Christians from following the Lord wholeheartedly.  When considering the typical Christian movie, the basic plot-line follows someone who is homely or plain through various trials until their true inner beauty finally shows through, while the beautiful or attractive characters turn out to be evil and manipulative.  Christians have developed a distrust of beauty and regarded it as a worldly evil.  Once again Wesley reminds men that when they “lay out money to please [their] eye, [they] give so much for an increase of curiosity, for a stronger attachment to these pleasures which perish in the using” (Wesley 246).  Beauty is not only unnecessary in pursuing God, but it can distract from Him by causing men to become too attached to worldly, perishable items.  Superficial beauties are considered to detract from the true worship of God rather than enhance it.  

Contrary to this belief, the Church ought to embrace beauty as a quality of true virtue.  Beauty is not merely a physical attribute, but also a spiritual one.  In The Nature of True Virtue, Jonathan Edwards eloquently argues that true virtue consists in beauty.  Virtue is “the beauty of those qualities and acts of the mind that are of a moral nature” (Edwards, “The Nature of True Virtue” 244).   These spiritual attributes or virtues are considered praiseworthy on account of their beauty.  Beauty is not only an outward quality, but one which characterizes the inner qualities which the Church so prizes.  

Furthermore, beauty stems from one of the greatest virtues, love.  The essence of love “is the thing wherein true moral or spiritual beauty primarily consists” (Edwards 250).  True spiritual beauty is that which stems from a virtuous love of benevolence.  Far from rejecting beauty as superficial, Edwards considers it not only an exalted virtue, but the root from which all virtues stem.  As beauty is the root of virtue, it ought to be an essential part of Christianity.

Because beauty reflects the glory of God, it is a crucial means of proclaiming Him to the world.  The Psalms are filled with vivid descriptions of nature displaying God’s glory.  The psalmist proclaims that “the heavens are telling of the glory of God; And their expanse is declaring the works of His hands” (NASB, Psalm 19:1).  From the beauty seen in nature, man can learn of God’s glory.  The glory seen in majestic mountains, in roaring ocean waves, in the overarching dome of deep blue skies studded with diamond stars, is a mirror projecting an image of the even greater glory of the Creator.  Hence beauty can be instrumental in revealing God to others.  Since the beginning, His creation “has been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that [men] are without excuse” (Romans 1:20).  Beauty reveals God’s glory to men, so that they have no excuse for not trusting in Him. By implementing beauty into their buildings, the Church would be able to point even more clearly to the Creator.

Furthermore, beauty is a powerful tool to inspire awe and reverence towards God.  The beauty in magnificent churches-high arched domes frescoed with Biblical scenes, towering pillars overlaid with gold, stunning stained glass windows-inspires awe in men which leads them to worship God, the Lord of beauty.  

For as God is infinitely the greatest being, so he is allowed to be infinitely the most beautiful and excellent: and all the beauty to be found throughout the whole creation, is but the reflection of diffused beams of that Being who hath an infinite fullness of brightness and glory. (Edwards 252)  

God’s beauty is so far superior to any man-made beauty, that all other beauties merely reflect back to God His own majesty.  Thus beauty found in churches, by reflecting God’s own beauty, will lead men to contemplate the most beautiful one of all. 

Finally, beauty is crucial in aiding men to further understand the nature of God.  Through observing natural beauties, one can better understand God’s spiritual beauties.  As God is supreme ruler over all, and mankind is dependent upon Him, “there is the resemblance of a decent trust, dependence, and acknowledgement in the planets continually moving round the sun, receiving his influences... an image of majesty, power, glory and beneficence in the sun in the midst of all” (Edwards, “Beauty of the World” 14).  The sun’s glory and brilliance mirror the majesty of its Creator.  Also, the softer beauties of flower and tree reflect “every grace and beautiful disposition of mind, of an inferior towards a superior cause, preserver, benevolent benefactor, and a fountain of happiness” (Edwards 14-15).  Beauty can reveal some character of God, pointing men towards a deeper understanding of His nature.                  

As beauty reflects God’s glory, stirs men to worship Him, and reveals His nature, beauty should be an essential part of Christian virtue and worship, regardless of the fact that modern Christians have abandoned beauty to the world.  First, beauty is crucial because it reflects God’s glory.  Furthermore, beautiful objects inspire worship of God in men’s hearts.  Finally, through contemplating the beautiful, one can come to understand God’s character more clearly.  Beauty is not merely a physical attribute, but also a spiritual quality which is essential to true virtue; therefore the Church should be willing to reclaim beautiful things for Christianity and re-incorporate beauty into worship.  Though modern churches sacrifice beauty for the sake of utility, the Church ought to strive to beautify their buildings, not for their glory, but to further God’s glory.


Enjoy!  And please, leave comments with any critiques or further questions you may have :)


Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Beauty in the Modern Church-part 2

To continue on this topic from a few days ago...this afternoon I took Sarah to lunch at a charming restaurant in Old Town Orange called PJ's Abbey.  Formerly a Victorian Baptist Church built in 1891, it is now an American style restaurant.  It was absolutely gorgeous :)  and I should be able to get some pictures up later today.  For now, here's the description that I wrote while there.

A restaurant in a church.  Strange, you say?  Almost as strange as a church housed within a warehouse, perhaps.  Though clearly a restaurant, with tables and chairs for a cozy meal, waiters bustling round, and cheery holiday music playing, the building still retains a very churchy atmosphere.

Spectacular stained windows tower of the room, reflecting the little bit of sun that shines through on this cloudy day.  A rather small and simple church, much care has been put into its design nonetheless.  High arched windows and a lofty ceiling draw one’s attention upwards to heaven.  Even the wooden beams supporting the antique architecture are carved with a simple, yet elegant picture, showing the amount of work put into each detail of the church.  Both older and more modern artwork adorn the walls in charmingly distressed wooden frames.  The needlepointed chairs, wooden benches resembling old pews, artwork, and indeed every detail, enhance the atmosphere of the old country church.  

Every detail serves a purpose, but every detail is made beautiful as well.  Here there is no division of the practical and the beautiful.  Here there can be seen no schism between functionality and artistry.  Take the old pulpit, for example.  Once it stood at the head of the church, as a stand for the preacher.  Now, it stands as a podium at the entrance to the restaurant.  Yet it is not only a purposeful tool, but a beautiful piece of artwork.  Here and throughout the restaurant/church is this mentality reflected; that a thing can be both useful and ornamental.  

Monday, December 22, 2008

Beauty in the Modern Church-part 1

As many of you already know, right now is Term Paper season in Torrey.  This quarter for my term paper, I've decided to write on the use of beauty within church buildings, and how we ought to make our sanctuaries more beautiful to reflect the glory of God and inspire men to worship Him.  To better write this term paper, I have and will be visiting several churches, both modern and ancient, to compare what I consider to be beautiful, and not beautiful (and also as proof that the type of church I write about in my paper really does exist).  Yesterday afternoon, I had the privilege of visiting Cornerstone Church in Anaheim, touring the campus and taking pictures.  So below is what I wrote after seeing the campus, as well as a few of the about 40 pictures I took ;)

Cornerstone, a perfect picture of a contemporary church building.  Once a warehouse used to house a computer company, it now houses a congregation fo vibrant and active believers.  The main sanctuary especially is a reflection of the modern, functional style seen throughout the rest of the vast building.

Painted a neutral beige, the concrete wall stretch up to a silver lined sky.  Wooden beams and lighting wires criss-cross the insulation covered ceiling in an intricate pattern of shapes and angles.  Spotlights and speakers hang dow from the ceiling, making no attempt to conceal themselves. Rather, the various technical tools flaunt themselves as if they were proud of their purpose without pulchritude.

The entire sanctuary, laid out in a simple square, seems to be al angles, hard walls, and vast open spaces, and does nothing to hide its former purpose.  It is as if they (who is they?) are proud of their modern functionality and practicality, but could there be more?  Could beautifully designed sanctuaries, soaring stained glass windows, and ornately gilded molding be more than merely superficial ornaments?

This use of beauty in worship spaces is not only more appealing, it is downright essential.  The church, the actual building, is the place where the body of Christ gathers in worship, and the one place more than any other where God is present on earth.  If one’s church is the home of the God Most High, does the church not owe to God the very best home that they can give Him?  Do they not owe to Him a home that is worthy of His majesty and reflects His glory?  


And pictures will be coming in the next post :)

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

3 things, or the relationship of Goodness Truth and Beauty to the three parts of man

Today in Foundations we talked about a lot of wonderful things, including Chesterton.  But the biggest by far was an amazing epiphany I had regarding threes.  Ever since Wheatstone I've been fascinated by sets of three...namely Goodness Truth and Beauty, as well as Hands Head and Heart.  I was particularly thrilled to discover the correlation of the three aforementioned parts of man to Lewis' description in the Abolition of Man to the Stomach, Head and Chest.  
Plato's Phaedrus also talks in some detail about threes.  In said dialogue, Socrates gives a description of the soul as a charioteer (Reason) and a good and bad horse, one which represents good desires and one sinful desires (as near as I can make out from Plato, that is).  It's interesting that you can tie that description from Plato to Lewis' statement that...The Head (charioteer/reason) rules the Stomach (bad horse/fleshly desires) through the Chest (good horse/right desires).  
But today in class Mr. Bartel tied them all together in an amazing way.  For some time now I've been trying to find some correlation between the soul's three parts and the three pillars of Christian living, goodness truth and beauty.  What Mr. Bartel showed us today was how they relate.  
1) Hands-Goodness most closely relates to the hands.  How to live rightly, do good things, etc.
2) Head-Truth-What is truth, how can we know things...truth deals mainly with the intellect.
3) Heart-Beauty-what are right sentiments and feelings?  What is truly beautiful and how do we recognize it...beauty deals mainly with the heart.
I am very excited to see this finally tying together.  Thank you so much Mr. Bartel for enlightening me in this!  And thank you Wheatstone for first opening my mind to these wonderful threes!
Under the mercy,
Elizabeth

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

First Class!

Hooray for Foundations!  I must confess I was a bit nervous starting class this afternoon, as we have a handful of new students in our class as well as a new tutor.  However, everything exceeded my expectations and we had a wonderful discussion!  Four things that I'm looking forward to this year...
1) Fellow classmates-it took quite a long time for our class to warm up to each other and actually discuss last year.  Today we actually had a pretty decent discussion compared to first semester discussions last year, and I foresee much improvement with this.
2) Mr. Bartel-I have heard Mr. Bartel highly praised over the summer, and he has definitely lived up to all the praise I heard.  He was funny, intelligent, and helped us to get at the answers without handing them to us.  Everyone greatly enjoyed him I believe and I am greatly looking forward to this year with him.
3) Poetry-As I have heard much of Mr. Bartel's love for poetry, I'm pretty excited to read the American poetry later in the second semester.  I'm also hoping to hear some of his thoughts on poetry in general as well as maybe if I can work up the courage to ask his advice on my own poetry...poetry is a beautiful thing is it not?
4) Starbucks-Hooray for having a Starbucks within walking distance of our site!  After class hopefully we can make it there some Tuesdays.  Sadly though I just found out that they no longer carry the base for making decaf frappaccinos...so sad.  
I hope that all my fellow Torreyans had wonderful first classes as well!
Under the mercy,
Elizabeth

Friday, August 15, 2008

Locke, Dante, Tolstoy...and Bartel?

Today, happiness abounds, for happy torrey classes are approaching but summer is still here.  Yesterday was my Torrey orientation at Biola, where I got my first assignment (ugghh), and found out who will be my guide through my head-life for the next year.  I've decided that orientations are much happier things your second year in Torrey, when you know many people there and can see friends from Bubbs who you rarely see in real life, and have the fun of already having heard rumors about tutors but don't know for sure.  Yes, orientation was a happy thing.   Thank you Grace, Amy, Cree, Ariel, Jessica, MaryKate, Paige, and Emily for contributing to this happiness :)
This summer has been a very productive one, I believe, especially after Wheatstone.  I've gotten to read many good books, which brings me to the title of this post...representing both the whence and whither of this year.  The what have you done so far, and what are you going to do.
1) Locke...first Foundations book...my first reaction to him is a definite "what on earth are you talking about sir?"  With perseverance I am sure he will be wonderful but right now when I'm still in summer mode it'll take some work to make me read and *gasp* precis it before the first class.
2) Dante...thank you thank you thank you Gabriel for making me read Dante now instead of in 10,000 years.  Inferno was fabulous and eye opening, Purgatorio is amazing so far, and I really hope to be able to finish all of him before school starts.  His poetry is just sublime!!!  I love the Divine Comedy, I am so excited to re-read it in Faith now...*sniff* a very long time to wait
3) Tolstoy...an absolute genius of story-telling...I read Anna K for the first time earlier this summer, and am now re-reading it, the sure test of a good book.  His way of writing characters that are actually real people instead of representatives of a specific virtue or vice is absolutely phenomenal.  Anna, Levin, Kitty, Stiva, and so many characters just seem to be brimming with life in all its agonizing wonderfulness.  Tolstoy, you are amazing and I wish I could write 1/100 as good as you.
4) Mr. Bartel...my Torrey tutor for Foundations!!!!!!!!!   I am officially very excited for this year now, I have heard so many wonderful things about him and I'm hoping he can bring a new level of community to our class.  
Right now, I'm definitely looking forward to the school year...we'll see how happy I am in a month when I'm in full swing with precii (plural of precis?), reflection essays, discussions, Hobbes, economics and biology, prepping for Dominican Republic trip...you get the picture!
Happy ending of summer everyone!
Under the mercy,
Elizabeth